Comments on: Rann [Hindi] Movie Review – II

By: mooka-prekshaka

mooka-prekshaka — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:57:05 +0000

No matter how much paid fanboys scream, bellitere’s reviews rarely go wrong.

By: Sweety

Sweety — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:45:31 +0000

Bad news is that Rann is a disaster at box office.. check this link:
http://movies.rediff.com/report/2010/feb/02/ishqiya-beats-rann-at-box-office.htm

By: Vinodh

Vinodh — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:24:25 +0000

Bad news is the film is based on the media like the ones who has written this review..

By: Sweety

Sweety — Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:07:51 +0000

background score is pathetic and confused.. The rediff reviewer Sukanya Varma has analysed it better, “the background score is so dauntingly exaggerated and blaring, it’s hard to tell shocked from spooked”

By: TLM

TLM — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:33:48 +0000

The movie deserves a 3 * and not 1 like the reviewer mentioned. There are so many other crappy movies compared to this. Big B, Paresh Rawal, Mohnish Behl & Ritesh Deshmukh have done a wonderful job. Comparing them to Sudeep, he has a long way to go. The villain of the movie for me was the Camera, it just killed me. The chosen angles do not justify the mood of the movie. B/G score was excellent. Could have done away without the songs and more story editing.

By: Latoya

Latoya — Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:51:26 +0000

This review is utter nonsense. It deserves
2.5 we have seen more crap than this
movie. Rgv could have done better. It will
be an average grosser.

By: Suraj

Suraj — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:50:07 +0000

Girish, u r missing the point here.. Just bcos its not a love story, it doesn’t automatically qualify for an applause! Moreover if u see Rann, it seems that the maker of Satya and Company was not making any experimentation but was looking for some quick bucks.

Just watch Satya & Company once again before concluding that whoever is criticizing Ramu for his Rann is doing it out of grudge. Not only you’ll realize how silly Rann looks in front of those masterpieces, you’d realize what the true RGV could have done of this movie.

By: legend032

legend032 — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:40:19 +0000

film is not so bad………………average…..i recommend to c …….because our SUDEEP is there,,,,,

By: girish

girish — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 15:06:32 +0000

pls don’t write this type of reviews!! i don’t think movie is as bad as it is projected here!! though RGV is on low now, don’t forget he has given cult movies like company, satya, rangeela etc. he has the caliber of making a masterpiece too as well as movies like RGV ki AAG.. but what he does is lots of experiment, breaking out of usual routine formula!! he wants to take risk by trying out different things!! he’s not stereotyped like karan johar or aditya chopra who can make only crap love stories!! and this review is not genuine and its written just for sake of criticizing ramu!!

By: Mahesh

Mahesh — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:30:51 +0000

Bakwas movie.. But one extra star could have been awarded to Neetu Chandra’s curves even though they dont have any relavance to the movie
Ramu is a changed man post RGV ki Aag and he’s low on confidence also regd his direction skills. He’s become more arrogant and boasts a lot before the movie release after the Aag disaster. Effects of lack of confidence. Moreover barring Rangeela, he’s very poor in directing non-horror and non-gangster movies.

By: Rakesh

Rakesh — Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:05:01 +0000

VERY BAD REVIEW………..!!!!!

Dont write review if u haven’t seen the movie……or could not understand the movie…
But if u have seen the movie and understood the movie and still u r writing this nonsense then RANN must be targetting u (ie.. u must be a corrupt journalist )